1883 – UK

‘The ratio of pressure forces to viscosity forces in a fluid flow’

The Reynolds number is a dimensionless quantity (that is, it has no units). The number has great importance in fluid dynamics.

The number depends upon the speed, density, viscosity and linear dimensions (such as the diameter of a pipe or height of a building) of the flow. Fluid flow is described as ‘Turbulent’ when the number is greater than 2000. It is considered ‘Laminar’ (steady) when the value is less than 2000.

Reynolds presented the concept of a number to determine the type of fluid flow in a paper –
‘An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether motion of water shall be direct or sinuous and of the law of resistance in parallel channels’
– in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society.

He observed that the tendency of water to eddy becomes much greater as the temperature rises –
he associated temperature rise with a decrease in viscosity (the resistance of a fluid to flow).

Wikipedia-logo © (link to wikipedia)



Related sites
  • JD Jackson (personalpages.manchester.ac.uk)
  • TodayInScience (todayinsci.com)

[To] mechanical progress there is apparently no end: for as in the past so in the future, each step in any direction will remove limits and bring in past barriers which have till then blocked the way in other directions; and so what for the time may appear to be a visible or practical limit will turn out to be but a bend in the road.
— Osborne Reynolds
Opening address to the Mechanical Science Section, Meeting of the British Association, Manchester. In Nature (15 Sep 1887), 36, 475.

5 thoughts on “OSBORNE REYNOLDS (1842-1912)

  1. Pingback: JOSEF STEFAN (1835- 93) LUDWIG BOLTZMANN (1844-1906) | A History of Science

  2. Pingback: “Heat Rises”; “Laminar, Eddies” | NerdlyPainter

    • Not exactly in line with the general theme here – although I approve. [http://moregeoffneilsen.wordpress.com/]
      As this is art – may I even suggest that the natural element of your work could be the most difficult effect to capture? (Not forgetting J.Pollock)


  3. Pingback: DANIEL BERNOULLI (1700- 82) JAMES CLERK MAXWELL (1831- 79) | A History of Science

  4. Pingback: GOTTFRIED LEIBNIZ (1646-1716) | A History of Science

Leave a comment - especially if you find factual or grammatical errors

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s